Cutting Young Girls Isn’t ‘Religious Freedom’

It’s important for readers to know that Female Genital Mutilation is not “Female Circumcision”. That is a term used by defenders of the practice in order to make FGM seem equivalent by comparison to male circumcision. Circumcision of males carries the same risk of infection as any other medical procedure that involves cutting skin but is otherwise harmless. FGM on the other hand has long-lasting, often lifelong physical and emotional consequences for girls and is done for purposes that have nothing to do with a woman’s health or well-being.

I’m not going to define it in detail but please go here if you do not know the basics. The modern phenomenon, at least in the West, has its foundation in Islamic culture based on advice given by Mohammed to allow the practice, who considered it “noble”. Despite the fact that even Mohammed did not mandate FGM, in the West it is often treated as mandatory and enforced on young girls without their consent by physicians in their religious community. Needless to say this has created unspeakable psychological wounds for countless Muslim women being raised in countries such as Germany, Great Britain, and as we see here, increasingly in America.


FGM doctors plan religious freedom defense, Dershowitz on legal team

by Pamela Geller [The Geller Report]  *  29 August, 2017

This is a crucial case. If the FGM doctors really claim religious freedom to justify their savagery, and win, the precedent will have been set that one can break any existing laws if one’s religion demands it. The doors will be opened for jihad activity, wife-beating, and every other criminal action justified by Islam. It is a massive blot on Dershowitz’s career that he would get involved in this and take this stance.

“Cutting Young Girls Isn’t Religious Freedom,” by Kristina Arriaga, Wall Street Journal, August 24, 2017 (thanks to Mark):

Earlier this year, a 7-year-old girl from Minnesota entered an examination room at a clinic just outside of Detroit. Thinking this was a regular visit, she allowed the doctor to remove her pants and underwear and place her on the examination table. Suddenly, while two women in the clinic held her hands, the physician spread her legs and cut her clitoris. Two months later she told investigators the pain ran down to her ankles and she could barely walk.

In April Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, who allegedly performed the procedure, was charged with conspiracy to commit female genital mutilation. Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, the owner of the since-closed clinic, was also charged. Investigators suspect Ms. Nagarwala may be involved in 100 other cases, and the trial starts in October. This marks the first time a female genital mutilation case is going to federal court. The lawyers for the Michigan physician will argue the girl “underwent a benign religious procedure.” This is a dangerous hypocrisy with far-reaching consequences.

Female genital mutilation has been illegal in the U.S. since 1996. Yet a 2012 study in the journal Public Health Reports estimates that more than 500,000 girls in the U.S. have undergone the procedure or are at risk. These girls live all over the country, with larger concentrations in California, New York and Minnesota. Most go through this process in secret, and only 25 states have laws that criminalize the procedure. In Maine, the American Civil Liberties Union has opposed a bill to do so on the ground that “the risk of mutilation isn’t worth expanding Maine’s criminal code.”…

The physician’s lawyers announced they will craft a religious-freedom defense. And they may be astute enough to get away with it. The all-star team includes constitutional law scholar and O.J. Simpson lawyer Alan Dershowitz, along with Mayer Morganroth, who represented assisted-suicide champion Dr. Jack Kevorkian for more than 15 years. They are funded by an international Muslim organization called Dawat-e-Hadiyah….

3 thoughts on “Cutting Young Girls Isn’t ‘Religious Freedom’

  1. Young women are speaking out against this in parts of Africa and attitudes in some regions are changing for the better there.

    Children have a right to bodily integrity. This also applies to routine infant male circumcision in the US. FGM and male circumcision have nothing to do with health or hygiene or cleanliness. All the myths used to support these barbaric, superstitious practices have been debunked. (You can research this for yourself online now.) These practices are about power and control and need to be rejected. These harmful practices abnormalize coitus and thus harm the sexual love of the spouses, and thus do harm to marriages.


  2. Liberals are always the ones telling us to get “on the right side of history”. Seems to me this a pretty key issue to get on the right side of!!! (Literally)

    Liked by 1 person


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s